On the feast of St. Albert the Great, November 15th, 2025, our studentate celebrated the accomplishment of Father Paul’s term as our Master of Students; and at the same time, the welcoming of Father Hilary, as our new Master. We thank Father Paul for his hard work and silent dedication during the past years to each of us, especially in our trials. We thank God for him. We continue praying for him in his new mission in Spain, as he will also keep us in his prayers.
Likewise, we express our heartfelt welcome to our new Master, Father Hilary. He has recently finished his doctorate at the Angelicum, in Rome. As a member of the very first batch of Dominican vocations from Myanmar who studied Theology in Macau, Father Hilary is now committed to walk with us in our good and bad times, as a brother. We are grateful to him for his generous acceptance of this office and pray that the Holy Spirit enlighten him to guide us.
We also added to the joy of that day the joint birthday celebration of some brothers of the community, as well as the welcoming of Father Martin Bai into our community.
May God continue showering his blessings upon this studentate community in Macau!
On the memorial of St. Josaphat the martyr, 12th of Novemeber 2025, the studentate saw the commissioning and blessing of Brother Francisco Zin Ko Lin for his mission to Taiwan. We thank God for His grace these 5 years of his studentate formation in Macau, and we celebrate Brother Francisco’s “Fiat” to embark on a foreign land to preach the Gospel. Let us earnestly pray for him and for the mission in Taiwan!
In a solemn and joyous liturgical celebration filled with songs and prayer, the Dominican Province of Our Lady of the Rosary witnessed the ordination as Deacons of three of its friars. The ceremony took place at St. Joseph Seminary church, at 3:00 p.m. on October 7th, a date of profound significance as it was the Solemnity of Our Lady of the Rosary, the Patroness of the Province.
The three newly ordained deacons were: Brother João Baptista Pereira, OP; Brother Gaspar De Jesus, OP; and Brother Matthew He Yue Sai, OP.
The ordination ceremony was presided over by His Excellency Stephen Lee Bun Sang, Bishop of Macau, who conferred the sacrament of Holy Order of the Diaconate through the laying on of hands and the prayer of consecration. In his homily, he underscored the diaconate’s call to a life of service, both at the altar and in the world, encouraging those being ordained to embody the charity of Christ in their ministries.
The event was a powerful display of the universal and communal nature of the Church. The presence of Bro. João Baptista Pereira’s father, who traveled from East Timor to witness his son’s ordination, added a poignant touch of familial love and support. The congregation was a vibrant tapestry of the wider religious family in Macau, including members of the Jesuits, Comboni, Divine Word Missionaries, etc. The Dominican family was strongly represented by friars from the two Hong Kong communities, Dominican Sisters from Macau and Lay Dominicans both from Hong Kong and Macau, underscoring the deep bonds within the Order.
The liturgy was marked by its solemnity and reverence. The sacred songs, beautifully rendered by the Dominican student brothers, elevated the celebration and inspired the faithful in attendance.
At the end of the ceremony the newly ordained Deacon Gaspar addressed the congregation on behalf of his fellow deacons. In a heartfelt speech of thanksgiving, he expressed their profound gratitude to God, to the members of their families, to their formators…, and the entire community for their prayers and support throughout their years of formation.
After the liturgical celebration, all attendees were invited to a friendly tea reception at the adjacent St. Joseph School Hall. This provided a warm and fraternal atmosphere for the congregation to offer their personal congratulations to the new deacons and to share in the joy of this momentous occasion with the Dominican Family and the Church.
The ordination of Brothers João, Gaspar, and Matthew as Deacons marked a significant step in their journey of service to the Church, as they now take on new responsibilities in the ministries of the Word, the Altar, and Charity. The Dominicans of Our Lady of the Rosary Province give thanks to God for the gift of these three new deacons and pray for their fruitful ministries as they continue their journey of service in the Lord’s vineyard.
From the first to the second day of October 2025, during our University’s holiday break, our student brothers engaged in a prayer relay. We were invited by Dominicans abroad to a Rosary relay event to pray for peace. It is our duty as religious brothers to stand in the breach and pray for peace and salvation, especially when many of our brothers are from the beloved war-torn country of Myanmar. We have always been keeping this intention deep in our hearts, and thus we earnestly joined the worldwide Dominicans’ plead.
We formed pairs, and each pair committed to pray for two hours within the twenty-four hour period from 12pm of October 1, to 12pm of October 2. We kept vigil with the Lord suffering in each mourning soul in the war-torn lands. Even as we lifted our hearts to pray with Mother Mary, we have also received much consolation in this team prayer event. We united ourselves with the world to pray in this 8-day prayer relay.
Blessed be God, and thanks be to Mother Mary: Gaza experienced a ceasefire in that same week! We will continue to hold the nations and individuals struck by wars in our hearts. May God grant peace to the world through Our Lady of the Rosary.
Brother Marcus Tan, OP,
October 11, 2025
Distant Shores Media/Sweet Publishing, CC BY-SA 3.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0>, via Wikimedia Commons
For someone seeking Jesus, intimacy with him is most important. And, ordinarily, our best means of gaining intimacy with him is knowing him in the Scripture. This makes the knowledge of the historicity of the Gospel very important. In this informal essay, I will present some evidence on the historicity of The Gospel According to Mark.
Quick Facts
From the Encyclopedia Britannica, it is certain that “…[The Gospel According to Mark] is the shortest and the earliest of the four Gospels…”. Furthermore, it was “presumably written during the decade preceding the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE” (Britannica).
Looking at Primary Sources
I wish to introduce an early witness, Papias, regarding the authorship of the Gospel, for authorship influences its reliability greatly. Papias, according to Britannica, flourished in the 2nd century and was a bishop of Hierapolis, now in Turkey. He was thus an early Church leader, whose view reflects the early Church’s belief, at least in general. Furthermore, “According to the 2nd-century theologian St. Irenaeus, Papias had known the Apostle John.” (Britannica). Papias would thus be a second-generation Christian, having heard the apostle.
Going Deeper:
Can we trust St. Irenaeus? St. Irenaeus, according to Britannica, was born around 120/140 AD and died around 200/203 AD. He was the Bishop of Lyon (now in France) and was declared, by the Catholic Church, a doctor of the Church for his sanctity and knowledge. He has an important work, “Adversus haereses (Against Heresies), written about 180…” (Britannica). Furthermore, “His own works establish a few biographical points, such as that he, as a child, heard and saw St. Polycarp, the last known living connection with the Apostles, in Smyrna, before that aged Christian was martyred in 155.” (Britannica). He was thus a third-generation Christian, the “grandson” generation of the apostles. His Adversus haereses is trustworthy for two reasons. First, St. Irenaeus was intellectually objective. The work aimed to defend orthodox Christian doctrines against heresies. And in so doing, St. Irenaeus would summarize the heretical views before rebutting them. And, “After the discovery of the gnostic library near Najʿ Ḥammādī (in Egypt) in the 1940s, respect for Irenaeus increased: he was proved to have been extremely precise in his report of the doctrines he rejected.” (Britannica). This means he is intellectually objective in dealing with opposing views. Second, St. Irenaeus would, in general, have to carefully check his sources to prevent his opponents from falsifying him. The opponents “said that they possessed a secret oral tradition from Jesus himself.” (Britannica). And “Against such statements Irenaeus maintains that the bishops in different cities are known as far back as the Apostles—and none of them was a gnostic [the heretic]…” (Britannica). In short, Irenaeus relied on the evidence of the succession of bishops in order to defend orthodox beliefs. He must have had been very careful in certifying the bishop list, or else his opponents—who could also access historical sources, being contemporary with Irenaeus—could falsify him. This is an example of why St. Irenaeus would have to be careful in checking his sources. In short, St. Irenaeus’s work has general credibility.
Having now known briefly about Papias, let us look at what he wrote. The below photo is from the book (p.15-16) Jesus and the Eyewitnesses (2006) by Professor Bauckham, a historian at the University of Cambridge.
I will highlight that Papias has integrity and that he can ascertain his information. He has integrity because he says he is writing what he had “learned carefully in the past from the elders and noted down well, for the truth of which I vouch.” He has the ability to know reliable information because he acquired his information from the elders, who either knew the disciples of the Lord—e.g. the apostles Andrew or Peter—or were the disciples of the Lord themselves—Aristion and the elder John (note, this elder John is different from the Apostle John, who had been mentioned separately in the text). Thus, Papias’s testimony regarding certain facts is trustworthy.
Finally, let us look at what Papias’s testimony is (picture is from Bauckham, p.203).
Papias testifies that the Elder, who was either a disciple of the Lord or a disciple of the disciple, taught that Mark heard what Peter taught, and in turn wrote down the Gospel. Peter gave his teachings in chreiai form, which basically means anecdotal form (Bauckham, p.216), corresponding to how the Gospel comprises discrete pericopes and units of speeches of Jesus. Mark “made it his one concern not to omit anything he had heard or to falsify anything.” Thus, Mark reproduced what Peter said accurately, though the narrative may not be in strict journalistic chronology. For example, perhaps we can discern textual evidence in the Gospel that the sequence of certain episodes is arranged thematically rather than chronologically. In short, Mark was an honest person, and he was in a position to ascertain what Peter had taught. Thus, his Gospel is a reliable source of eyewitness accounts.
Distant Shores Media/Sweet Publishing, CC BY-SA 3.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0>, via Wikimedia Commons
Thus, Mark’s contemporary fellow disciples loved it and preserved this document, reflecting their trust in Mark’s reproducing accurately Peter’s testimony. The Elder’s testimony regarding Mark, reported by Papias, should not be singular, but rather should reflect the early Church’s common belief. If not, then there would probably be dissension regarding its apostolicity among the second-generation and first-generation disciples. Yet, Papias, who knew disciples from those generations, did not report such a dissension but instead advocated the Elder’s tradition. Thus, there was probably no dissension regarding the apostolicity of the Gospel. Therefore, one can safely believe in Mark’s historicity.
Андрей Николаевич Миронов (A.N. Mironov), CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons
Conclusion
Imagine you were a contemporary of Papias, respecting him as a bishop who knew the Apostle John. Now, Papias the Bishop testifies to you that, after careful examination with various disciples of Jesus or disciples of the disciples of Jesus, he found that it has been testified among these first and second generation disciples that Mark wrote the Gospel, following Peter’s words accurately. You would have good reason to trust, then, that the Gospel indeed reproduced what Peter said regarding Jesus. And Peter was an eyewitness to Jesus. So, from the Gospel According to Mark, you would be seeing what Jesus did and taught. Amazing!
Distant Shores Media/Sweet Publishing, CC BY-SA 3.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0>, via Wikimedia Commons
Of course, this brief presentation of the evidence alone is far from the whole case for the historicity of the Gospel; much more can be said, such as an argument from modern miracles. But this is solid evidence. Therefore, the Dogmatic Constitution Dei Verbum (1965) taught, “Holy Mother Church has firmly and with absolute constancy held, and continues to hold, that the four Gospels just named, whose historical character the Church unhesitatingly asserts, faithfully hand on what Jesus Christ, while living among men, really did and taught for their eternal salvation until the day He was taken up into heaven (see Acts 1:1). ” (#19).
May we be closer to the Lord day by day!
Hi! I am Brother Marcus, a Malaysian Chinese born in 2000. I studied in an international secondary school in Shanghai, and I majored in Computing Mathematics from the City University of Hong Kong. I joined the Order of Preachers immediately thereafter. Having received God’s love so intimately, I wish to keep receiving His love fully and loving Him back fully, dedicating myself to study and to share the beauty of the truth.
